Sunday, 4 November 2012

Fears from Chill Wind

parliamentary information office: "The latest tracking polls at the time
of writing show Mitt Romney marginally ahead"

How much Moroccan has this journo has been smoking?

Romney may from time to time have come out on top on national polls, but he has NEVER been ahead in any projection of the Electoral College, indeed apart from perhaps a week or so, he's barely managed to trouble 230 Electoral College votes.

Paddy Power has already paid out today on Obama, for pity's sake.

I always thought "Matthew d'Ancona" was merely David Cameron's nom de plume.  As Cameron isn't a total idiot, then I suppose that the Telegraph's typesetting department has simply put the wrong name to the article.  It had to be some sclerotic, partisan old Republican with the most tenuous grip on reality.




parliamentary information office: With state funded british broadcaster, the BBC producing and airing in the states a superpac advert, a total pro Obama political broadcast, along with its daily pro obama stance and comment on BBC America, as well as its web site, Obama all the way - the republicans are evil racists controlled by the Tea Party - the British government should not be suprised if a republican president gives them the cold shoulder





parliamentary information office: Romney wins by a landslide  all state internal polls show him winning blue states that the left wing media says he has no chance to win .The left is terrified as they should be.As for the UK and your politics-A tory is still a liberal here in the US.Does it really matter in a socialist nation like  the UK .Not much I WOULD SAY.You guys need to abandon socialism it is destroying all of Western Europe while Eastern Europe is embracing true representative government so they prosper.Elect Daniel Hannin or someone like him to President of  the UK and dissolve the EU before you fall into total depression and anarchy like Greece.Time is short Europe.

   

parliamentary information office: Unless the polls are consistently wrong Romney is going to lose.  He should be romping home of course; the US economy is terrible, Obama pulled a pretty big bait 'n' switch on his left wing support & has largely failed to live up to his initial promise.  The fact that Romney doesn't have this in the bag already just shows what a crap candidate he is.

I suppose when Obama wins this columnist will pen his "Good news for Cammers, incumbents can win even though they've made a complete hash of everything!" piece.  But Dave, unlike Obama, doesn't have the polls on his side.



One stop at parliamentary information office and meet the view of Parliamentary Discussion.

Saturday, 3 November 2012

Information on Pension Changes

parliamentary information office: Pee off you troughing barstewards. You steal 67% ofour icome, waste it and steal the rest. The FSA chair was paid £800,000 basically to look the other way while Brown ruined banking legislation. That same ex PM then firehosed the state with excessive pensions, huge salary increases and bought another 2 million unnecessary jobs.

So no, we *can't*  work any harder. It doesn't make any difference to us except raising you more money to waste.

Stick it, thieving whelp. How about you do more with mmuch less, such as reducing your salary to £15,000 instead of £65K? Ah, what am I thinking! You'd just steal the rest from me anyway.



parliamentary information office: The value of pension pots will be whatever it will be. That hasn't changed. All they have done is changed the set of unrealistic assumptions of growth in pension pots to another set of unrealistic assumptions.

The only currently sensible option is to assume zero real growth and base your savings decisions on that. Keep a constant eye on your pot, especially as you near retirement.


parliamentary information office: What he is trying to say is that people will have to work longer in order to have a larger pension pot so that either the financial institutions can cream off even more money in fees or bad service to pay for their greedy lifestyles or governments can cream off money in stealth taxes on pensions to pay for their ineptitude...either way we get rogered


parliamentary information office: Unless of course you are an MP: these politicians retire early on a pension most of us cannot even dream about!


Yearbook Online - parliamentary information office

Thursday, 1 November 2012

Care Information

parliamentary information office

hospital trusts have been paid millions of pounds in recent years for hitting targets associated with use of the Liverpool care Pathway.

In some cases trusts have set goals explicitly requiring them to ensure that a set number of dying patients are placed on the pathway"

Who paid this money (names?) and which trusts (names?) set goals for numbers?

We ought to be told these things.

In any case of misuse, criminal penalties should follow - and all past cases should be investigated.


parliamentary information office


I have actually seen it referred to as 'passive euthanasia' by a senior clinician in a medical article hosted by a renowned UK institution, and frankly, it is a more honest and accurate description than calling it a 'care pathway'.

parliamentary information office

It appears to be a varied and variable practice, whose misapplication is only emphasised by terming it a 'Care Pathway.

parliamentary information office

It is not whether or not it is a good practice that is at issue, but why it is apparently not being applied correctly in accordance with its own terms.

parliamentary information office


There is something morally wrong with encouraging NHS Trusts to increase the number of patients receiving this so-called "care", it is tantamount to incitement to murder.
With this in mind, my wife and I have asked both our daughters to ensure that a second, independent, opinion is obtained should either of us have the misfortune to be seriously ill in hospital. There have been at least two cases reported in the press recently where the family of a "dying" patient on the "Care pathway" took action to have treatment restored, with the result that the patients were at home recovering within days. Two potential errors is two too many.

parliamentary information office

An even better article.

I would mention that 'passive euthanasia' isn't illegal in the UK. The problem appears to be that the LCP appears to be being used as a euphemism to cover instances when the procedure being applied would be more correctly termed 'passive euthanasia'.

As the article mentions, passive euthanasia and the LCP have different intentions. To make matters worse if the patient has been placed on the LCP then a signed document will exist confirming this, so there should never be any confusion between the two procedures.


Yearbook News

Saturday, 20 October 2012

Labour party faces EU vote decision

Senior Labour party figures are urgently discussing whether to match David Cameron's expected promise to hold a referendum in the next parliament on renegotiated British terms for EU membership.

Cameron is due to make the commitment in a landmark speech by Christmas and Labour will face pressure to say if it will do the same.

One senior Labour figure said any such commitment now "would split the party", adding it was better for Labour to argue in the short term that the chief priority for Europe was to sort out a system of governance inside the eurozone that worked, and that boosted growth in Britain's chief export markets. Demands now for a renegotiated relationship into those already fraught discussions might backfire, senior party figures said. In the short term Labour should hold fire on its position pending the 2015 manifesto.

But the former Labour Europe minister, Denis MacShane, urged the party to state now that it would hold a referendum if Labour formed a government after 2015.

He said: "Labour should offer a referendum after 2015 but make clear we will not isolate Britain from Europe in the meantime and we will campaign for Britain to stay in the EU.

"All David Cameron has done is send himself naked into every EU conference chamber between now and the next election."

Cameron's stated position is that he wants Britain to remain in the EU, but on new terms and in a more disengaged manner. A Foreign Office-led review of the balance of competencies is under way and will form the basis of British demands to the EU likely to be put around the time of the next election.

As the 17 countries of the eurozone are forced to pool more powers in response to the single currency crisis, the idea is that the Lisbon treaty will need to be renegotiated to facilitate the kind of changes being pursued.
That would supply Cameron with the opportunity to try to redefine Britain's place in the EU, agreeing to allow greater integration for those who want it in return for being able to "repatriate" areas of policy-making from Brussels.

The Cameron strategy, as seen from Brussels, is fraught with risk and uncertainty. It is not at all clear that the Lisbon treaty will be renegotiated. In an interview with the Guardian, the French president, François Hollande, bluntly opposed the notion since it could necessitate a referendum in France. Hollande, who strongly backed a Yes vote in the French referendum on a new EU constitution in 2005, was dealt a blow by France's rejection and is keen to avoid any repeat.

The Germans have been the strongest advocates of treaty change and renegotiation. A senior official said on Wednesday that Berlin felt it would be clear by December that the Lisbon treaty would need to be reopened.
However, there are moves to try to retool and reshape the eurozone while avoiding a renegotiation. Many in Brussels fear renegotiation would open a can of worms.

Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, told Cameron this week that she was not in any hurry to renegotiate the treat, according to senior EU diplomats who say her call is a tactical device aimed at securing her eurozone policy aims in a battle with the French.

They are confident Berlin would back off on its demands if its aims could be achieved by different means.
There is criticism of Cameron that if he tries to cherrypick the EU bits that suit him and ditch the rest, others will be encouraged to follow suit, inviting a chaotic and damaging free-for-all.

Hollande hinted in his interview that he would prevent this from happening. While he accepted that Britain would not join the euro and was generally "in retreat" over Europe, he said: "The British are tied by the accords they have signed up to. They can't detach themselves from them."

Tuesday, 16 October 2012

UK raised border queues ‘at the highest level’ with Spain, Liddington reassures Parliament

Britain this week raised the issue of disproportionate border checks and delays “at the highest level” with the Spanish Government.

This was stated in Parliament yesterday afternoon by Europe Minister David Liddington who was responding to a question in an emergency debate instigated by the all party Gibraltar group.

 
Mr Liddington made clear it had not been raised with the Spanish Ambassador because it had been raised at a higher level directly with the Spanish Government although officials later declined to say exactly who this referred to. It was raised outside of the EU foreign ministers’ meeting, it was confirmed. The fact that the queues had not been imposed yesterday was not missed by anyone.

In Parliament Mr Liddington noted that this last weekend significant delays had occurred at the border of 45 minutes to six hours as a result of the more rigorous checks by the Guardia Civil on cars leaving the Rock. He also noted the reduced delays yesterday.


“Spain has justified the more rigorous checks as being anti-tobacco smuggling operations between Gibraltar and Spain. Tobacco smuggling does occur between Gibraltar and Spain. However the Spanish authorities have not provided the Gibraltar authorities with evidence that in this case increased checks were required.” Mr Liddington noted that the delays come at a time of increased tension resulting from the fishing dispute over Spanish fishing rights in British Gibraltar Territorial Waters.


The Europe Minister reported that the view in Gibraltar is that the delays are intended to increase pressure on Gibraltar to resolve the fishing dispute. He also noted that both Chief Minister Fabian Picardo and the ASCTEG, the Spanish workers association, had criticised the delays.


PROTEST


Disruption and border queues, he said, have an effect on the wellbeing and prosperity of communities on both sides of the border especially the several thousand Spanish workers. “The (UK) government position is that these delays are unacceptable and have no place at a border between EU partners,” he said adding that the issue had been raised over the weekend at a very high level with the Spanish Government. It will also be protested formally to the local Guardia Civil, he added.


Mr Liddington said the UK would continue to monitor the situation closely and “take whatever appropriate action is necessary to support the free movement of people between Gibraltar and Spain.”


WATERS ‘ARE BRITISH’


Eleanor Laing, the MP with special MOD responsibility including Gibraltar said that the local management of the Guardia Civil in La Linea and Algeciras were doing whatever they wish “not only on the border but by making incursions at sea in British Gibraltar Territorial Waters whenever they wish to do so.” She said this was done in a way deliberately designed to make life difficult for the people of Gibraltar and their government.


Mr Liddington said that where there might be a special need for legitimate checks at the border he would expect the Spanish authorities to be open with the Gibraltar authorities about these. “That has not been the case hitherto in this instance.”


On maritime incursions Mr Liddington said that that Britain is “absolutely confident” in its sovereignty over British Territorial waters.


“That is why the Royal Navy challenges Guardia Civil and other Spanish vessels whenever they make unlawful maritime incursions,” he said adding that this is backed up with diplomatic protests to the Spanish Government about all unlawful incursions.


“Those challenges and protests make clear that such incursions are an unacceptable violation of British sovereignty,” said Mr Liddington.


‘JOINT SOVEREIGNTY PLAN WAS BETRAYAL’


Emma Reynolds MP the Labour shadow for Mr Liddington invited a retort when she raised the Gibraltar issue and echoed the sentiment that the delays at the border were unacceptable.


She asked what was being done to investigate the Spanish action and also what pressure was being exerted to get Spain to return to the trilateral forum.


Mr Liddington replied that the delays got in the way of sensible economic relations between Gibraltar and its neighbouring Campo. Unjustified border queues will, he said, be raised on each occasion at the appropriate level. He added that Gibraltar itself regularly co-operates with Spain in tackling tobacco smuggling and other forms of criminal activity and that is the sort of sensible co-operation UK wants to see.


Expressing regret that the current Spanish government refuses to take part in trilateral talks given that it has served Gibraltar, Spain and the UK well he said that UK would like to see “some kind of equivalent collaborative system established.”


Taking up Miss Reynold’s remark on support for British sovereignty over Gibraltar and respecting the rights of the people of Gibraltar Mr Liddington said he was grateful for this.


“I particularly welcome this if it does indeed mark a break with the proposals for shared sovereignty and betrayal of the people of Gibraltar which the Labour party supported when they were in government.” The remark drew great cheers.


CIVILISED


Simon Hughes, Liberal MP said Spain should do the civilised thing which is to work with Gibraltar when there are issues at the border given that we are in the EU and not the third world.


Mr Liddington responded saying this is often on the agenda in discussions between the British and Spanish side. But he also pointed out that the Spanish Prime Minister has publicly stated that he does not want the argument over Gibraltar to get in the way of a mutual bilateral relationship with the UK.


“I hope that we can very much get back to the sort of practical local level cooperation (that Mr Hughes referred to).”


Angus McNeil MP urged that the Spanish Ambassador should be called in each time there is a long queue and be kept waiting for five hours himself. Meanwhile Denis McShane former Europe Minister urged “less queue, queue and more jaw, jaw”.


Mr Liddington however rejected Mr McShane’s description of Gibraltar as a nightmare. “I don’t think Gibraltar is a nightmare. It is a thriving and now very prosperous community where there are entrepreneurial people who want good relations with Spain but also want their democratic rights respected and want to remain British.”


Iain Paisley MP said that the Prime Minster should tell Spain to get its arms off Gibraltar “it’s not going their way.”


Source: UK raised border queues ‘at the highest level’ with Spain, Liddington reassures Parliament

Monday, 8 October 2012

Parliamentary Yearbook Resources Importance

Parliamentary Yearbook Resources like blogs, articles, review websites, press releases related with Parliament news play significant role to deliver valuable news updates on Parliament to the people.


Parliamentary Yearbook Resources are attached to various topics like business, health department, education, science research centers, industries, sports and more.


They can also shows the new job updates in Parliament with detailed information. Some resources offer discussion flexibility so people can post their review on related topics. Parliamentary Yearbook Resources in the form of business directory will give you contact details also.


Parliamentary Yearbook Resources are known for their quality based information, latest updates on Parliament, valuable discussion on topics, planning information for future development of nation.


This is blog post about Parliamentary Yearbook and Parliamentary Information Office.



Saturday, 6 October 2012

U.K. Parliament Report: BBC Pay Scheme Helps On-Air Stars Avoid Taxes

LONDON - A report from a U.K. parliamentary committee says that the BBC is helping thousands of employees, including about 1,500 on-air hosts, news readers, actors and other talent, avoid tax payments, according to the Daily Telegraph.

The Public Accounts Committee suggests that the public broadcaster is “complicit” in tax avoidance as it allows people to be paid as companies rather than individuals, it said. The arrangement allows both the BBC and the employees to pay lower taxes.

The BBC now acknowledges that about 1,500 on-air contributors, actors and others are paid under such freelance-style contracts, up from its previous estimate of 300, the Telegraph said. It highlighted that this figure includes the company's "best-known television and radio stars," but the report didn't mention specific names.

Newsnight host Jeremy Paxman for one recently said that the BBC asked him to set up a company or risk losing his role.

Overall, it has emerged that the BBC has 25,000 freelance contract arrangements. It acknowledges that it does not know if these freelancers are paying their taxes properly.

Margaret Hodge, the chairman of the Public Accounts Committee, told the Telegraph: “I want the BBC to stop and call a halt to what is completely unacceptable use of tax avoidance schemes...The BBC’s revenues are from hard earned taxes from ordinary families and they have a duty to lead by example – they have a double duty to be cleaner than clean."

The BBC had told her committee that the use of freelance workers is “a pretty standard model” in media and “important to the economics of the BBC."

The paper quoted the BBC as saying about the committee report: “We note the conclusions of the PAC report and will respond to the points raised as part of our detailed review of tax arrangements.”










parliamentary yearbook | parliamentary information office